Author : Manu Pawar

4 Posts - 0 Comments

Manu is a law student at Faculty of law Delhi University. He writes regularly on law and current affairs. He loves travelling, out door games.You can reach him at his email at Pawarmanu10@gmail.com

Divya Pharmacy v Union of India, High Court of Uttarakhand, WP3437/2016, Decided on 21 December 2018.Sudhanshu Dhulia, J

Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 2024

by Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 20240193

Case Summary Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgement Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details “Divya Yog Mandir”, is a Trust, registered...

DU LLB Environmental Law Semester 6

Orissa Mining Corporation v Ministry of Environmetn and Forest,(2013)6 SCC 476

Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 2024

by Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 20240207

Case Summary Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgement Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J.:...

DU LLB Environmental Law Semester 6

Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 248Ranganath Misra, CJ

Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 2024

by Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 20240115

Case Summary Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgement Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details...

DU LLB Environmental Law Semester 6

Church of God (Full Gospel) in India v. KKR Majestic Welfare ColonyWelfare Association, AIR 2000 SC 2773Shah, J

Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 2024

by Manu PawarJune 3, 2024June 30, 20240128

Case Summary Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgement Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details The questions involved in this appeal are...

Author : Manu Pawar

Divya Pharmacy v Union of India, High Court of Uttarakhand, WP3437/2016, Decided on 21 December 2018.Sudhanshu Dhulia, J

Orissa Mining Corporation v Ministry of Environmetn and Forest,(2013)6 SCC 476

Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 248Ranganath Misra, CJ

Church of God (Full Gospel) in India v. KKR Majestic Welfare ColonyWelfare Association, AIR 2000 SC 2773Shah, J

UNPAID SELLER SECTION 45 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR SECTION 16 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP FIRM & DISSOLUTION BY COURT OF FIRM

STATUTORY TRANSACTIONS (SALES OF GOODS ACT, 1930)

CONTRACT FOR WORK OR LABOUR

Top 10 IMPORTANT QUESTIONS FOR DU LLB Semester...

Top 10 IMPORTANT QUESTIONS FOR DU LLB Semester...

HOHFELD Theory OF RIGHTS AND DUTIES ANALYSIS

Theory of Interests Roscoe Pound USA

Dicey Rule of Law Jurisprudence Concept

Recent Posts

UNPAID SELLER SECTION 45 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR SECTION 16 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP FIRM & DISSOLUTION BY COURT OF FIRM

Editor's Picks

UNPAID SELLER SECTION 45 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR SECTION 16 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP FIRM & DISSOLUTION BY COURT OF FIRM

Lifestyle

UNPAID SELLER SECTION 45 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR SECTION 16 OF SALES OF GOODS ACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP FIRM & DISSOLUTION BY COURT OF FIRM

Categories

Login

Create Free Account