June 23, 2025
DU LLBLaw of TortsSemester 1

Rajkot muncipal corporation V Manjulben jayantilal Nakum & orss 1997 ( 9) ACC 552

Citation
Keywords
Facts
Issues
Contentions
Law Points
Judgment
Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority

Full Case Details

Principles

  • Three ingredients
    • There was a legal duty of defendant
    • Breach of the duty
    • Plaintiff sustained some legal injury
  • Tortious liability falls
    • Some intentional wrong doing
    • Negligence −Negligence is a concept which can not be applied in straight jacket formula .
    • Strict liability
  • Article 136 of the constitution of India − Special leave
  • Res ipsa loquitur − Fact speaks itself
  • There is no reasonable proximity between the duty of care and the doctrine of neighborhood laid by the House of Lords in Donoghue v/s. Stevenson [(1932) AC 562].

It is foreseeable or is likely to harm by one’s carelessness is essential.

Related posts

Ms. Ghulam Kubra Bibi v Mohd. Shafi Mohddin 1940 Case Analysis

Rahul Kumar Keshri

Chunnilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spn. & Mfg. Co. Ltd.AIR 1962 SC 1314

MAYANK KUMAR

Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. The Workmen(1967) 1 SCR 882 : AIR 1967 SC 469

vikash Kumar

Leave a Comment