February 3, 2025
DU LLBLaw of TortsSemester 1

Rajkot muncipal corporation V Manjulben jayantilal Nakum & orss 1997 ( 9) ACC 552

Citation
Keywords
Facts
Issues
Contentions
Law Points
Judgment
Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority

Full Case Details

Principles

  • Three ingredients
    • There was a legal duty of defendant
    • Breach of the duty
    • Plaintiff sustained some legal injury
  • Tortious liability falls
    • Some intentional wrong doing
    • Negligence −Negligence is a concept which can not be applied in straight jacket formula .
    • Strict liability
  • Article 136 of the constitution of India − Special leave
  • Res ipsa loquitur − Fact speaks itself
  • There is no reasonable proximity between the duty of care and the doctrine of neighborhood laid by the House of Lords in Donoghue v/s. Stevenson [(1932) AC 562].

It is foreseeable or is likely to harm by one’s carelessness is essential.

Related posts

State of Bombay v. K.P. Krishnan(1961) 1 SCR 227 : AIR 1960 SC 1223

vikash Kumar

ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO (CONGO v. UGANDA) ICJ Rep (2022) (State Responsibility: Forms of Reparation)

vikash Kumar

M/s. Nopany Investments (P) Ltd v. Santokh Singh (HUF)2007 (13) JT 448

Tabassum Jahan

Leave a Comment