February 9, 2026
DU LLBLaw of TortsSemester 1

Rajkot muncipal corporation V Manjulben jayantilal Nakum & orss 1997 ( 9) ACC 552

Citation
Keywords
Facts
Issues
Contentions
Law Points
Judgment
Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority

Full Case Details

Principles

  • Three ingredients
    • There was a legal duty of defendant
    • Breach of the duty
    • Plaintiff sustained some legal injury
  • Tortious liability falls
    • Some intentional wrong doing
    • Negligence −Negligence is a concept which can not be applied in straight jacket formula .
    • Strict liability
  • Article 136 of the constitution of India − Special leave
  • Res ipsa loquitur − Fact speaks itself
  • There is no reasonable proximity between the duty of care and the doctrine of neighborhood laid by the House of Lords in Donoghue v/s. Stevenson [(1932) AC 562].

It is foreseeable or is likely to harm by one’s carelessness is essential.

Related posts

Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh AIR 1973 SC 2537

vikash Kumar

Union of India v. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vasco De Gama (1990) 1 SCC 277

Tabassum Jahan

Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Bihar(1989) 3 SCC 271 : AIR 1989 SC 1565

vikash Kumar

Leave a Comment