Govinda Pillai Gopala Pillai v. Aiyyappan Krishnan AIR 1957 Ker 10
Case Summary Citation Govinda Pillai Gopala Pillai v. Aiyyappan Krishnan AIR 1957 Ker 10 Keywords sec 52 tpa, competent jurisdiction, gifted property Facts A dispute
Home
Page 94
Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. v.H.H. Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji DeoAIR 1975 SC 1810 : (1975) 2 SCC 530
Case Summary Citation Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. v.H.H. Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji DeoAIR 1975 SC 1810 : (1975) 2 SCC 530 Keywords section 52
M/s. Nopany Investments (P) Ltd v. Santokh Singh (HUF)2007 (13) JT 448
Case Summary Citation M/s. Nopany Investments (P) Ltd v. Santokh Singh (HUF)2007 (13) JT 448 Keywords karta, joint family Facts The Karta of a Hindu
Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Chander Sen(1986) 3 SCC 567: AIR 1986 SC 1753
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.- These appeals arise by special leave from the decision of the High Court of Allahabad dated August 17, 1973. Two of these
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Gomedalli Lakshminarayan, AIR 1935 Bom. 412
Case Summary Citation Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Gomedalli Lakshminarayan, AIR 1935 Bom. 412 Keywords Sec 66, 55, 3, 14(1) of Income Tax Act,
Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti DebiAIR 1957 SC 255 : 1957 SCR 77
Case Summary Citation Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi AIR 1957 SC 255 : 1957 SCR 77 Keywords Sec 19,21 of TPA Facts Ramani Kanta
R. Kempraj v. Burton Son and Co.AIR 1970 SC 1872 : (1969) 2 SCC 594
GROVER, J. – This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Mysore High Court in which the question involved is whether
Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit HazraAIR 1967 SC 744 : (1967) 1 SCR 293
RAMASWAMI, J. – This appeal is brought, by special leave, from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated November 18, 1959 in First Appeal
Ram Newaz v. NankooAIR 1926 All 283
MEARS, CJ and LINDSAY, J. – This is the appeal of the plaintiffs who had instituted a suit asreversioners of one Ram Charan for the
Tulk v. Moxhay(1843-60) All ER Rep. 9
Case Summary Citation Tulk v. Moxhay(1843-60) All ER Rep. 9 Keywords sec 10, 11 tpa, conditions Facts The claimant, Tulk, owned several properties in Leicester