November 7, 2024
DU LLBLaw of ContractSemester 1

Ajudhia prasad V chandan Lal AIR 1937 All 610 Case Analysis

CitationAjudhia prasad V chandan Lal AIR 1937 All 610 Case Analysis
Keywords
Facts
Issues
Contentions
Law PointsWhere money has been borrowed by two minors under a mortgage deed at a time when they were minors, more than 18 years but less than 21 years of age, under a fraudulent concealment of the fact that the executants were minors because a guardian had been appointed for them under the Guardians and Wards Act,

Can the mortgage in a suit brought against them get a decree for the principal money under S. 65, Contract Act or under any other equitable principle, and can he also get a decree for sale of the mortgaged property
JudgmentStrictly follow doctrine of restitution
Can not be extend to money cases mortgage deed can not enforced
Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority

Full Case Details

To do

Related posts

Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka 2007 RLR 27 (NSC)

Arya Mishra

Gyarsibai v. The State, 1953

Dharamvir S Bainda

Bishwanath Prasad v. Dwarka Prasad (1974) 1 SCC 78 : AIR 1974 SC 117

vikash Kumar

Leave a Comment