November 22, 2024
DU LLBLaw of TortsSemester 1

M. P. Electricity Board v Shail Kumar, AIR 2002 SC 551

Citation
Keywords
Facts
Issues
Contentions
Law Points
Judgment
Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority

Full Case Details

Facts

  • one Joginder Singh, aged 37 years, was riding on his bicycle on the night of 23−8−1997 while returning from his factory.
  • A snapped live electric wire was lying on the road.
  • There was rain and the road was partially inundated with water.
  • The cyclist could not notice the electric wire and as he came in contact with the same, he died instantaneously due to electrocution.

Principles

  • The rule of strict liability applied and the defect of the dangerous thing being an ‘act of the stranger’ was not allowed because the same could have been foreseen.
  • The rule of Strict Liability was applied and it was held that the Board had statutory duty to supply electricity in the area.
  • If the energy so transmitted causes injury or death of a human being, who gets unknowingly trapped into it, the electric supplier shall be liable for the same.
  • If the electric wire was snapped the current should have been automatically cut off.
  • Authorities manning such dangerous commodities have extra duty to chalk out measures to prevent such mishaps.
  • The defence that the snapping of wire was due to the act of the stranger who might have tried to pilfer the electricity was rejected.

Related posts

Principle of Mens Rea and Strict Liability

Dharamvir S Bainda

Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur Decided on 1 July, 2019 (SC) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5124 OF 2019

Tabassum Jahan

Mohd. Khalid v. State of W.B. (2002) 7 SCC 334

vikash Kumar

Leave a Comment