Smith v Leech Brain & Co (1961) 3 All ER 1159
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Issues Held
Home
Page 106
Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963) AC 837 [HL]
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts The lamp was subsequently dropped and caused a
Overseas Tankship [U K] Ltd V Morts Dock & Engineering Co [ The WagonMound] ( 1961 ) 1 All ER 404
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Test of reasonable foresight The test of
In Re an Arbitration between Polemis and Furness withy & Co. ( 1921) 3 KB 560
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES The test of directness
King V Phillips ( 1953) 1 QB 429
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Singleton, L.J.,
Dulieu V White (1901) 2 KB 669
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Kennedy J
Page v Smith (1995) 2 All ER 736
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts The plaintiff, Mr Page, was involved in a
Alcock V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991) 4 All ER 907(HL)
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Shock must be cause by unaided senses
McLoughlin V O Brian ( 1983) 1 AC 410 ( HL)
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles Held
(Hay or ) Bourhill V Young [1943] AC 92 – (1942) 2 All ER 396
Citation Keywords Facts Issues Contentions Law Points Judgment Ratio Decidendi & Case Authority Full Case Details Facts Principles D therefore could owe no duty of