February 21, 2025
DU LLBLabour LawSemester 4

LL.B. IV Term Paper – LB – 403 – Labour Law

PART A: TRADE UNIONS

Topic 1: Introduction to Labour Law

History and Development of Labour Law, Importance and its Sociological Understanding, Philosophical Issues, Marxism and Labour Law.

1. Kahn Freund’s Labour and Law (Hamlyn Lecture Series) 1 Introduction: Some Reflections on Law and Power, pp. 14-20 (1983).

2. Marxism and Labour Law (Edited version based on Hugh Collins, Marxism and Law, Claredon Press, Oxford, 1982).

Topic 2: Trade Union – Definition, Registration and Recognition

Definitions of ‘trade union’, ‘workman’ and ‘trade dispute’ – The Trade Unions Act, 1926, Sections 2(g) and (h), 3-13, 15, 22

3. Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions, AIR 1962 Mad. 231
4.The Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers’ Union, Madras v. The Registrar of Trade Unions, AIR 1962 Mad. 234
5. In Re Inland Steam Navigation Worker’s Union, AIR 1936 Cal 59
6.The Food Corporation of India Staff Union v. Food Corporation of India & Ors, AIR 1995 SC 1344.

Topic 3: Immunities – Criminal and Civil

The Trade Unions Act, 1926, Sections 17 and 18; The Indian Penal Code, Sections 120-A, 120-B

7. R.S. Ruikar v. Emperor, AIR 1935 Nag. 149
8. Rohtas Industries Staff Union v. State of Bihar, AIR 1963 Pat. 170

(Also see Rohtas Industries v. Its Union, AIR 1976 S.C. 425)

PART – B: INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES Topic 4: ‘Industry’ – Conceptual Analysis

The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(j)

9. Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa, AIR 1978 SC 548
10. State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh (2005) 5 SCC 1 82 11. 97

Bombay High Court, Writ Petition no. 787 of 2007, order dated 22-06-2018

Topic 5: ‘Industrial Dispute’ v. ‘Individual Dispute’ – Contrast

The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sections 2(k), 2A

11. Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate, AIR 1958 SC 353 99

12. Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll) AIR 2000 SC 1274: (2000) 3 SCC 224 107
13. J.H. Jadhav v. Forbes Gokak Ltd. (2005) 3 SCC 202

Topic 6: Concept of ‘Workman’

Distinction between contract for services and contract of service: Due control and super-vision test; Predominant nature of duty test, The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(s)

14. Dharangadhra Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1957 SC 264 115

15. A. Sundarambal v. Government of Goa, Daman & Diu, AIR 1988 SC 1700 121

16. H.R. Adyanthaya v. Sandoz (India) Ltd. (1994) 5 SCC 737

Topic 7: ‘Strike & Lock out’

Concepts, legality and justification – The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sections 2(q), 2(l), 2(n), 10(3), 10A(3A), 22-28; The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; The Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1981

17. Management of Chandramalai Estate v. Its Workmen, AIR 1960 SC 902
18. Syndicate Bank v. K. Umesh Nayak (1994) 5 SCC 572
19. Essorpe Mills Ltd. v. P.O.; Labour Court (2008) 7 SCC 594
20. T. K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu and others, (2003) 6 SCC 581

Topic 08: ‘Lay off’ ‘Retrenchment’ & ‘Closure’

Analysis of the Concepts, Pre-requisites, The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sections 2(cc), 2(kkk), 2(oo), Chapters VA, VB; The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

21. Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court (1990) 3 SCC 682

22. The Workmen of Fire Stone Tyre & Rubber Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Fire Stone Tyre & Rubber Co. Pvt. Ltd. (1976) 3 SCC 819:
AIR 1976 SC 1775

23. U.P. State Brassware Corporation Ltd. v. Uday Narain Pandey (2006) 1 SCC 479

24. Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak & Ors (2013) 10 SCC 324

25. Management of the Barara Cooperative Marketing cum Processing Society Ltd. v. Workman Pratap Singh AIR 2019 SC

27. Manju Saxena v. Union Of India, Supreme Court of India Civil Appeal Nos. 1176611767 OF 2018, Judgment Dated: 3.12.2018

28. Ram Manohar Lohia Joint Hospital v. Munna Prasad Saini CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5810 OF 2021, Judgment Dated: 20 September, 2021

Related posts

Spes Successionis section 6(a) and 43 Transfer of Property Act answer writing

Tabassum Jahan

Cherubin Gregory v State of Bihar 1964

Dharamvir S Bainda

In re Delhi Laws Act AIR 1951 SC 332

Tabassum Jahan

Leave a Comment