In Re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves AIR 1960 SC 845
Case Summary Citation AIR 1960 SC 845 Keywords Preamble, Article- 3, Article-1, Amendments, Article 368, majority, first sechdule . Facts During the partition in India
Home
Page 83
State of West Bengal v.Union of India AIR 1963 SC 1241
(B.P.Sinha, C.J. and S.J.Imam, K.Subba Rao, J.C.Shah, Rajagopala Ayyangar and J.R.Mudholkar, JJ.) [Nature of the Indian Constitution – (a) Federal [(i) Compact or agreement between
S. R. Bommaiv.Union of India 1994 (3) SCC 1
(S.Ratnavel Pandian, A.M.Ahmadi, Kuldip Singh, J.S.Verma, P.B.Sawant, K.Ramaswamy, S.C.Agrawal, Yogeshwar Dayal and B.P.Jeevan Reddy, JJ.) [President’sRuleinStatesunderArticle356–groundsandscopeofjudicialreview] In this case, the court examined issues such as
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461
Case Summary Citation AIR 1973 SC 1461 Keywords doctrine of basic structure, article 14, 19, 21 of the constitution Facts The case emerged in the
Abdul Hafiz Beg v. SahebbiAIR 1975 Bom. 165
MASODKAR, J. – On the principles that effect the dispositions under the doctrine of deathillness, law is fairly well settled. In “The Principles of Mohammedan
Hayatuddin v. Abdul GaniAIR 1976 Bom. 23
Case Summary Citation Hayatuddin v. Abdul GaniAIR 1976 Bom. 23 Keywords Facts The case dealt with the validity of the gift of Musha (undivided share)
Valia Peedikakkandi Katheessa Umma v. PathakkalanNarayanathKunhamu(1964) 4 SCR 549 : AIR 1964 SC 275
M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. – This appeal by special leave by Defendants 1 to 3 raises an important question under the Muhammadan Law, which may be
Musa Miya walad Mahammad Shaffi v. Kadar BaxwaladKhajBaxAIR 1928 PC 108
SIR LANCELOT SANDERSON – This is an appeal by Musa Miya waladMahamadShaffi, a minor, and Isa Miya alias MahamadIsmailkhanwaladMahamadShaffi; who were defendants 18 and 19
JupudyPardhaSarathy v. Pentapati Rama Krishna(2016) 2 SCC 56
M.Y. Eqbal, J.: This appeal by special leave is directed against order dated 21.9.2006 passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra
Jagannathan Pillai v.Kunjithapadam Pillai(1987) 2 SCC 572 : AIR 1987 SC 1493
M.P. THAKKAR, J. – Under the same law [Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956] in an identical fact-situation, a Hindu widow who has inherited